Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Planning process must be improved


Mark Pickering, Ashdell Road, S10

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 August 2008
UNLIKE your anonymous correspondent (Ignorance of the planning system, Letters, August 15), my community's experience of Sheffield's planning system is not the perfect utopia that he describes.
In the broader context, I do not understand how he can be so upbeat about the new buildings overlooking the Peace Gardens, the new car park on Eyre Street and several other recent prominent buildings. At local level in my neighbourhood the picture is
also far from perfect. For example:

(1) Planning officers and councillors routinely dismiss concerns about developments expressed by such Sheffield bodies as the Conservation Advisory Group and the Urban Design Review Panel and external bodies including the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment, set up by the Government to raise the standards of building design.

(2) Planning guidance on the design of shop fronts in Sheffield's conservation areas does not exist, unlike other towns and cities. So now we have shops with industrial shutters, a mish-mash of rendering materials, illuminated signs, fascia panels of all shapes and sizes, advertising hoardings, etc.

(3) Over 18 months ago my local residents association raised some questions about developments that it believed had not received planning permission.

The planners agreed the queries were of legitimate concern but a reply has never been received.

(4) Commercial premises in the neighbourhood where I live continue to flout planning law by trading outside the permitted times. No action is taken.

(5) Information about planning applications on the council's website is often confused, incomplete or out of date, making it difficult for people to keep track of them and have the input they are entitled to.

These are just some of the ways in which the planning process as it affects my community and probably others in Sheffield is unsatisfactory and should be improved. That may require more resources and different policies and it is our elected representatives who determine these. Then we judge them at the ballot box.



What do you think? Add your comments below

More:

Letters
St. Lukes' Debate
Forum
Local News
Local Sport
Arts Guide




The full article contains 349 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 August 2008 11:29 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: SHEFFIELD, SOUTH YORKSHIRE
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.