David R Smith, Brooklands Avenue, Sheffield S10.
EARLIER in the year, there was an announcement by Northern Rail (the operator of local train services) and the Department of Transport to run a two-year trial of "tram-trains" on the Sheffield to Huddersfield railway line beginning in 2010. The trial will cost £24 million.
All the articles I have subsequently read in the specialist magazines have suggested that the benefits to passengers will be minimal, however.
Indeed, the tram-trains may even have a lower top speed than existing trains; they may have fewer seats
and maybe there will be no toilet!
Now we have an announcement by South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive that they want to spend £80 million on improving bus services from Sheffield to Rotherham and to Handsworth and Waverley – the latter using the very busy Sheffield Parkway.
The irony of both these proposals is that tram-trains could be the ideal way and a golden opportunity to extend Sheffield Supertram to Rotherhan and to park-and- ride sites at Waverley (for Sheffield Parkway) and to Beighton (for Mosborough Parkway).
Tram-trains would travel from Sheffield Cathedral on the Meadowhall route as far as Nunnery Supertram depot, then join the little used Sheffield-to-Worksop railway line travelling about six miles as far as Beighton. Similarly, Rotherham tram-trains could join the Sheffield-to-Rotherham railway line near Tinsley.
I envisage 10-minute frequencies and journey times much less than the 30 minutes quoted for the bus journeys.
I also think my proposals would be cheaper than the £104 million that is being quoted for the above three schemes.
So I urgently request the Passenger Transport Executive to do some costing of my proposals and assess the benefits.
I would urge them to work closely with Sheffield Supertram and with Northern Rail to look at options for extending Sheffield Supertram in the most cost effective ways possible using tram-trains.
What do you think? Add your comments below
More:LettersSt. Lukes' DebateForumLocal NewsLocal SportArts Guide
The full article contains 342 words and appears in n/a newspaper.