MPs are to debate the proposed Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill this week. We have asked our panel what they think.
The bill is an updated version of current legislation on the use of human embryos. Whilst Gordon Brown argues the Bill is needed to enable vital medical research into treatment for conditions such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, cancer and heart disease, other MPs and ministers contend the proposed changes tamper with human nature.
What do you think? Add your comments belowThe main contested components of the Bill are: The use of hybrid embryos, which are 99% human, in research; that IVF clinics should no longer have to consider the need for a "father" figure when deciding whether to offer treatment, instead insisting on "supportive parenting"; and the so called "saviour siblings", meaning that circumstances in which children genetically matched to a sibling with a genetic disease can be created by IVF are to be relaxed.
At the same time, the Bill will seek a fresh attempt to lower the current 24 week time limit on abortions.
Click on the names below to see what the panelists think:Scott Barton
Faith Douglas
Dr Matthew Flinders
Robin HughesSaqlain MohammedRelated articles:
Dad defends test tube 'saviour sibling'
Embryo Bill clears first hurdle
Debate on controversial embryo BillRead more about the bill on www.parliament.uk >
The full article contains 235 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
