Sheffield heritage group calls for action to protect Conservation Areas
Joined Up Heritage Sheffield has issued a call to action to its subscribers, asking them to challenge council plans that appear to threaten the Conservation Areas that protect the city’s most historic districts.
Conservation Areas have been with us for over half a century.
So many irreplaceable historic buildings and so much of our precious landscape were lost during the war and the frenzy of development and urban expansion that followed that it seemed that our heritage could all but disappear.
The buildings and places we inherit are part of the story that belongs to all of us, the memories on which we build our identity and our future, and they urgently needed protection.
The first Conservation Area in England was created in 1967, and today there are over 10,000, home to 6.8 million people.
The first of Sheffield’s 38 Conservation Areas were created in 1969, in Beauchief.
Now they range from the tiny hamlet of Brightholmlee, where only one building is less than 150 years old, to the huge area of Victorian and Edwardian Nether Edge.
We have Betjeman's "prettiest suburb in England", Broomhill, and our proud and continuing manufacturing tradition is celebrated in Kelham Island.
Some, like the area around the Town Hall and Cathedral, are entirely urban, but others are landscapes or “green lungs”, such as Oakes Park or the General Cemetery.
Sheffield’s Conservation Areas have helped to preserve and enhance the best of our historic character.
They make desirable places to live, work and visit.
They are certainly popular with the public: in a recent YouGov survey, 84% of Conservation Area residents supported the protections they give, only 4% disagreeing.
Preservation of historic buildings and the environment is good for business, too: these attract the most economically productive businesses, and the historic ambience of such areas is the primary reason for many businesses to locate there.
There is a myth that Conservation Areas stop new development, but this is completely untrue. Sympathetic development is welcomed, and sites ripe for improvement are identified in management plans.
In Sheffield’s City ward, planning applications are refused less often in the parts covered by Conservation Areas.
Nationally, the rate of new building is only slightly lower in Conservation Areas than elsewhere, reflecting the environmentally-friendly practice of buildings being re-used instead of demolished.
This year marks the 50th anniversary of the first Conservation Areas in Sheffield, and we were expecting to celebrate it with the creation of a 39th area, in Castlegate.
The cuncil promised to do this in July 2017 as part of their kickstart funding initiative, repeating the commitment in March 2018 in the City Centre Masterplan, which also strongly advocated using heritage and history to maximise opportunity and quality of life.
The long-awaited consultation was scheduled for February this year, but on the day a notice appeared on the door saying it had been cancelled. No reason was given.
Worse still, the council then announced a review of all 38 Conservation Areas.
After half a century of looking after the city’s history, they served notice that across the city, from Dore to Ecclesfield, protections could be removed if Conservation Areas were, in their view, “a brake on development”.
So why the about-turn? Why has the council ignored the evidence and bought in to the myth that Conservation Areas impede development? It’s hard to know.
The decision to cancel Castlegate and order a review does not appear to have been debated in council or cabinet, but to have been made by an individual councillor.
Is it pandering to speculators? If so, it will satisfy only a vocal minority, as developers in the city know the economic value of heritage and our architects want to enhance it, not destroy it.
The council agree that Castlegate's heritage is key to its future, so why not protect it now?
Having found that it meets the criteria for a Conservation Area, why not do as the law says they must, and designate it without delay?
If they have any lingering doubts, they only have to look at the Cultural Industries Quarter, repeatedly cited as a case study by Historic England, or Great Neighbourhood award winner Kelham Island, now appearing on national lists of the best places to live.
Instead of looking for protections to remove, we should be looking for new areas to protect – something else the law says the council must do.
Conservation Areas have served Sheffield well in the past, and will be the foundation for our future success.